Slavery was but one of many hierarchical relations, including parent-child, husband-wife, master-apprentice, and master-servant, that arose within the legally constructed household. The Thirteenth Amendment’s prohibition on slavery and involuntary servitude, which contained no explicit domestic exception, inevitably raised the question whether domestic relations other than chattel slavery would be affected. The Supreme Court’s ruling in Robertson v. Baldwin (1897) carved out a domestic exception to the Amendment for children, wards, adult seamen and – in practice – women in intimate relationships. This article, written for a symposium on the Thirteenth Amendment and class, examines the origins, justifications, scholarship, and case law of Robertson’s domestic exception, including its application to seamen, abused children and battered women.
Keywords: Thirteenth Amendment, gender, class, battered women, child abuse, seamen, involuntary servitude, slavery
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Pope, James Gray, The Thirteenth Amendment at the Intersection of Class and Gender: Robertson v. Baldwin's Exclusion of Infants, Lunatics, Women, and Seamen (June 6, 2016). Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 39, No. Spring, 2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2791206
Newark, NJ
United States
973-744-3642 (Phone)
973-353-1445 (Fax)